Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Papers removed from court records in secret

Publish date: 02 July 2007
Issue Number: 1858
Diary: Legalbrief Today
Category: Corruption

In an action described by legal experts as at best inappropriate, the legal adviser to Zolile Ngcakani, Inspector-General of intelligence, asked for and received the co-operation of Jeremiah Shongwe, deputy Judge President of the Transvaal division, and Dreyer van der Merwe, a Pretoria magistrate, in removing pages from their court records without the knowledge of the opposing parties.

According to a report in The Sunday Independent, the 72 pages consist of a classified report written by Ngcakani relating to Billy Masetlha, the former Director-General of Intelligence, and Masetlha\'s affidavit made in camera. They form part of the record in Masetlha\'s Pretoria High Court case of November last year, in which Masetlha claimed that President Thabo Mbeki had unlawfully and unfairly terminated his employment; his still continuing trial in Pretoria\'s Hatfield Community Court, where he is facing charges related to his ‘refusal to answer questions put to him by the Inspector-General of Intelligence Services’; and his appeal in the Constitutional Court. Shongwe ordered the pages be removed from the High Court record while Van der Merwe assured Jay Govender, an advocate, that ‘the bundle’ of papers, in which the Inspector-General\'s report and other documents appear, was in his ‘safekeeping’ and no unauthorised person would be allowed access to them. Legal sources said that, while Govender\'s behaviour was not unlawful, it was highly irregular and contrary to legal protocol that she had not informed all parties about what she was doing – and given them an opportunity to agree or disagree with her actions. One attorney said that, at best, her behaviour could be called inappropriate; at worst, it was ‘staggering’ and ‘breathtaking’ and bordered on the unethical. Full report in The Sunday Independent

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.