Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Monotype loses copyright claim

Publish date: 05 October 2005
Issue Number: 1101
Diary: Legalbrief eLaw
Category: Copyright

Monotype Imaging, formerly known as Agfa Monotype, has lost a copyright dispute over a rival\'s font software that replicates typeface designs.

Out-Law.com reports that it alleged breaches of its copyrights, its trademark rights and also the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Monotype and its subsidiary International Typeface Corporation filed their lawsuit in the Northern District of Illinois in June 2003 over rival font developer Bitstream’s software called TrueDoc. Monotype\'s roots date back to the Nineteenth Century. It was Monotype that designed Times New Roman, on a commission from The Times newspaper in 1931. It was another commission from Microsoft that led Monotype to design Arial, a typeface that originally served as a cheaper substitute for Helvetica, designed by rival font designer Linotype. Today, Monotype and ITC license around 1 900 fonts to designers, developers, printer makers and others. Bitstream has been specialising in digital fonts since launching in 1981. Its best-known font is Swiss 721 BT, another Helvetica clone; but it licenses over 1 000 others. The judge ruled that Monotype and ITC had not put forward sufficient evidence to show that users of the software had actually used it in breach of copyright or trademark rights. Nor had they shown that Bitstream knew that TrueDoc was being used in breach of its rights. Full Out-Law.com report

Because file-sharing networks continue to house illegal files they should be shut down, CNET News quotes a California senator as saying. Intellectual property protection ‘can\'t function in a country where the high-tech services become such that you can\'t protect copyright,’ said Senator Dianne Feinstein, at a US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. The session centered on the landmark Supreme Court decision on MGM v Grokster, which ruled that file-sharing services can be liable for their users\' infringing behaviour. Pointing to what she called a ‘rise in peer to peers’ since the Grokster decision, Feinstein said current law is not effective enough to deter illegal file swapping and the government must enact stronger enforcement measures. ‘If we don\'t stop it,’ she said, ‘it\'s going to destroy these intellectual property industries.’ Full CNET News report

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.