Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Judges explain why SABC cameras were allowed in court

Publish date: 01 September 2005
Issue Number: 1411
Diary: Legalbrief Today
Category: Media

The media and legal profession need to work hand in hand to ensure that justice triumphs and that public trust in the legal system remains solid.

That, according to a report in the Cape Times, was the substance of a judgment explanation given by a full Bench of the Cape High Court yesterday. The judges explained why they had granted an application by the SABC to film Mark Thatcher’s court battle to avoid being questioned by Equatorial Guinea in connection with a coup attempt in the oil-rich country. The application was granted in October last year, but, at the time, no reasons were given. Yesterday, full reasons for the granting of the application were handed down in a 57-page judgment. Judge Deon van Zyl agreed with the SABC’s argument that the right of the electronic media to exercise freedom of expression in covering court proceedings should be no less than that enjoyed by the print media. Full Cape Times report

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.