Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

ISP ordered to clean up network

Publish date: 11 July 2007
Issue Number: 1191
Diary: Legalbrief eLaw
Category: Copyright

A legal victory by authors and composers in Belgium means that the country\'s third-largest ISP has six months to clean up its networks of copyright infringing material distributed via file-sharing networks.

The long-running case was brought by the Belgian Society of Authors, Composers and Publishers (SABAM) against ISP Scarlet, formerly Tiscali and the third largest operator in Belgium. In 2004, SABAM obtained an intermediary injunction against Tiscali, leading to the court appointing an expert. The expert recommended 11 techniques the ISP could use to identify peer-to-peer material, including Audible Magic\'s filtering software. The Register notes that last week a judge agreed that these were acceptable, and gave Scarlet six months to get cracking. ISPs once baulked at the implications of policing their networks, and sought to extend the ‘common carrier’ defence developed for the first circuit-switched telephone networks. However, the argument was not recognised outside the US, and could not be made when the carrier knew of the offence. Full report in The Register

The decision overturns conventional thinking on how two major European directives – the Copyright Directive and the E-Commerce Directive – relate to one another, says Struan Robertson, a technology lawyer with Pinsent Masons, in an Out-Law.com report. He notes that the Copyright Directive says copyright owners should be able to get relief from the courts against intermediaries whose services are used for piracy – the argument in this case. However, it adds that its provisions should not prejudice the E-Commerce Directive, which says ISPs are generally not responsible for the activity of their customers and that ISPs are not generally obliged to police their services for illegal activity. It is believed to be the first time that a European court has ruled that an ISP must block such traffic. Until now, ISPs have been seen to be conduits for information but that they are not held responsible for that information. The ruling could influence courts in other EU member states, though it will have been based on the particular Belgian laws which implemented the E-commerce and Copyright Directives, so its impact could be limited, Out-Law.com notes. Full Out-Law.com report

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.