Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Critics slam Jackson trial secrecy ruling

Publish date: 10 August 2005
Issue Number: 1395
Diary: Legalbrief Today
Category: Corruption

A ruling by the California Supreme Court allowing the Michael Jackson case to stand as a precedent on secrecy has come under fire from lawyers who say it could shut off public access to information in high-profile cases.

The court denied a request by news organisations to ‘depublish’ the ruling – meaning it will stay on the legal books and can be used by judges and lawyers on the issue of sealing documents in other cases, reports FindLaw. ‘It is a very dangerous precedent because it gives the court an opportunity to close out the public from critical information during a high-publicity trial,’ said law Professor Laurie Levenson. A three-member panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled in April that the judge in Jackson\'s child molestation trial had been justified in sealing dozens of court records. The judge has said releasing the documents could have prejudiced the jury pool. He said he was protecting the fair trial right of the pop superstar who was acquitted of all charges in June. Full report in FindLaw

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.