Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

ConCourt gives clarity of Medical Schemes Registrar’s power

Publish date: 09 April 2008
Issue Number: 2045
Diary: Legalbrief Today
Category: General

A long-running row between Council for Medical Schemes Registrar Patrick Masobe and Genesis medical scheme has finally come to an end, after the Constitutional Court denied Masobe the right to appeal against a High Court ruling compelling him to register the scheme’s rules for its benefit packages.

The decision has important implications, notes a Business Day report, as it provides clarity on the scope of the Registrar’s powers. It upholds the High Court’s finding that the Medical Schemes Act does not give the Registrar the authority to challenge decisions taken by his own council’s appeal committee, as to do so would mean he was defying the very body of which he was a functionary. Masobe had argued that the Act gave the Registrar administrative powers independent of the council. Yesterday Masobe said he accepted the Constitutional Court’s decision and had registered Genesis’s rules. Genesis lawyer Cassian Coquelle, a partner at Webber Wentzel, said the Constitutional Court’s decision provided much needed clarity on the powers of the Registrar. Full Business Day report

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.