Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

No political interference in apartheid-era cases – prosecutor

Publish date: 20 April 2026
Issue Number: 1173
Diary: IBA Legalbrief Africa
Category: South Africa

The National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) head of legal affairs, Advoc­ate Mthunzi Mhaga, has denied any polit­ical inter­fer­ence in the hand­ling of apartheid-era killings, telling the Khampepe Com­mis­sion all pro­sec­u­tions he was involved in were guided strictly by evid­ence. Mhaga said on Fri­day he had never exper­i­enced or wit­nessed any attempt by politi­cians or offi­cials to influ­ence pro­sec­utorial decisions dur­ing his career, reports the Daily Dispatch. ‘Throughout my career within the NPA, I have never been approached by any polit­ical office-bearer, exec­ut­ive mem­ber, or any per­son act­ing on their behalf, who sought to influ­ence, dir­ect, or inter­fere with the con­duct of any pro­sec­u­tion, invest­ig­a­tion, or pro­sec­utorial decision with which I was involved. Nor have I wit­nessed any such inter­fer­ence dir­ec­ted at my col­leagues within the units in which I served,’ he said. ‘All decisions per­tain­ing to the insti­tu­tion, con­tinu­ation, or with­drawal of pro­sec­u­tions in mat­ters that came before me were taken strictly on the mer­its of the evid­ence and in accord­ance with applic­able legal prin­ciples, guided by the NPA’s pro­sec­u­tion policy and dir­ect­ives. I, accord­ingly, state under oath that I have no know­ledge of any polit­ical inter­fer­ence within the NPA dur­ing any period of my employ­ment.’ The judi­cial com­mis­sion, chaired by retired Con­sti­tu­tional Court Judge Sisi Khampepe, is prob­ing whether attempts were made to block or delay invest­ig­a­tions and pro­sec­u­tions of apartheid-era crimes referred by the ruth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Pres­id­ent Cyril Ram­a­phosa estab­lished the inquiry in May 2025 fol­low­ing a court applic­a­tion by fam­il­ies of vic­tims who alleged that some apartheid-era cases had been delib­er­ately stalled. Mhaga, who served as a senior pro­sec­utor at the Eastern Cape High Court (Mthatha) between 1999 and 2006, later joined the NPA’s Pri­or­ity Crimes Lit­ig­a­tion Unit in Pre­toria, where he worked on TRC-related cases and helped estab­lish the TRC Task Team.

Mhaga told the com­mis­sion that the main obstacle in pro­sec­ut­ing these mat­ters was not inter­fer­ence, but a lack of invest­ig­at­ive capa­city. ‘In the absence of any formal arrange­ment with the SAPS, I would approach detect­ives with whom I had worked while pro­sec­ut­ing in the East­ern Cape, request­ing their assist­ance in cases that fell within their regions,’ he said. Des­pite the estab­lish­ment of the TRC Task Team in 2006, Mhaga said pro­gress slowed sig­ni­fic­antly between 2007 and mid-2009, reports the Daily Dispatch. Fin­an­cial con­straints also con­trib­uted to delays, he said. Dur­ing his testi­mony, Mhaga referred to sev­eral high ­pro­file cases he pro­sec­uted, includ­ing the killing of Umk­honto we Sizwe oper­at­ive Sthembele Zokhwe in Ngqa­makhwe in 1987, the 1985 murder of stu­dent leader Bathandwa Ndondo in Cala, and the Highg­ate Hotel mas­sacre in 1993, where five people were killed. He also handled the murder of three under­ground MK oper­at­ives – Zon­wabele Mayapi, Gift Mgibe and Zolile San­goni – who were killed by ‘askaris’ work­ing with then Transkei secur­ity police in Mthatha in 1988, as well as a rob­bery and murder case involving a police officer at the Wil­low­vale police sta­tion. Mhaga was called to testify after being described as an ‘implic­ated’ wit­ness by the com­mis­sion, an alleg­a­tion he rejec­ted. However, he told the inquiry that he could find no evid­ence link­ing him to any attempt to delay or sup­press TRC cases. Chief evid­ence leader Advoc­ate Ish­mael Semenya later apo­lo­gised, con­ced­ing that refer­ring to Mhaga as an implic­ated wit­ness had been incor­rect and ‘regret­table’.

Full Daily Dispatch report

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.