Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Parliament TV policy 'a minor' interference – Speaker

Publish date: 30 March 2015
Issue Number: 3721
Diary: Legalbrief Today
Category: General

Parliament’s policy not to allow the broadcast of disruptions in Parliament is to protect its dignity and is only a ‘minor’ interference with the right to freedom of expression, Speaker Baleka Mbete says in supplementary papers filed with the Western Cape High Court. A Business Day report notes Mbete’s affidavit was in response to an application brought by media organisations on the constitutionality of the policy on filming and broadcasting of Parliament, which holds that during incidents of ‘unparliamentary conduct’ and ‘grave disturbances’ the camera should remain on the Speaker. Mbete said if the media bodies got what they wanted – wide-angle shots of the chamber during disruptions – it would ‘only encourage the worst behaviour in Parliament’. The policy was balanced in the sense that disruptive incidents were ‘not ignored’, but the consequences – the encouragement of ill-discipline – were mitigated. Mbete noted there was no obligation to broadcast disruptive conduct as it was not ‘legitimate parliamentary business’.

Full Business Day report (subscription needed)

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.