Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Parliament argues media action is 'opportunistic'

Publish date: 05 March 2015
Issue Number: 3704
Diary: Legalbrief Today
Category: General

Parliament will ask the Western Cape High Court to strike the media's application about the video feed and signal jamming device from the roll as 'it is opportunistic and interferes with the legislature's independence', Beeld reports. This argument, presented by Jeremy Gauntlett SC, is contained in his heads of argument. The SA National Editors' Forum and some media houses are seeking an order setting aside the parliamentary video recording policy which censors disruptions in the house as well as an order barring the use of signal jamming devices. But Gauntlett argues that the Constitution gives Parliament the right to implement reasonable limitations to the public's and media's access to Parliament. He also claims that the application offends the constitutional independence of Parliament and that the courts should not interfere with the workings of this arm of the state. Gauntlett also challenges the applicants' contention that the matter is urgent.

Full Beeld report

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.