Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Shale gas licences likely to be delayed by litigation

Publish date: 23 May 2017
Issue Number: 508
Diary: Legalbrief Environmental
Category: Energy

It has been reported that government intends awarding shale gas exploration licences as early as September 2017, notes Matthew Burnell, a director at Herbert Smith Freehills, in an analysis piece on the Politicsweb site. ‘While this may be the case, we anticipate that, given the environmentalist and community opposition, exploration activities are likely to be delayed as these groups seek to exhaust all legal remedies to prevent these projects from proceeding,’ he writes. ‘As has been seen in other infrastructure projects in SA, objector groups have successfully delayed the commencement or completion of these projects using these legal remedies. There is little that applicants for exploration rights can do to avoid these groups appealing or reviewing decisions,’ explains Burnell. ‘What they can do, however, is minimise the veracity of these groups' claims by ensuring that their environmental impact assessment process is thorough and without procedural defects. This is particularly relevant in the public participation process,’ he states. ‘Consultation and the resolution of disputes during this process may be difficult (if not impossible) given the polar views of the environmentalists and communities when compared to the exploration right applicants,’ he notes. ‘This is compounded by the fact that environmentalists/communities tend to adopt a "no-development" attitude and are unwilling to compromise, as to compromise undermines their objectives to protect the environment,’ warns Burnell. ‘Although agreement may be impossible to achieve, there are legal and procedural techniques that can be used when creating and implementing a public participation procedure to reduce the risk of appeals and build a working relationship between the parties,’ he states. ‘Time and resources should be spend in developing and initiating this process to avoid extended delays in developing or operating these projects,’ he recommends.

Full analysis on the Politicsweb site

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.