Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Minister under pressure to parole Hani's killer

Publish date: 19 October 2020
Issue Number: 895
Diary: IBA Legalbrief Africa
Category: South Africa

Both the SA Communist Party (SACP) and the widow of Chris Hani – Limpho Hani – have yet to file their opposing papers in the bid by Janusz Walus in the Gauteng High Court (Pretoria), to be released on parole. According to a Pretoria News report, Walus, the Polish immigrant who assassinated Hani, SACP leader at the time, will launch his latest bid next month. Both the party and Hani’s widow are cited as respondents in the application. They were given time frames as to when they had to file their opposing affidavits. According to Walus’ lawyer, Julian Knight, Hani’s legal team had asked for an extension until the end of last month. But when the time came for them to file, they yet again asked for another extension. Both the SACP and the Hani family on each occasion in the past vehemently opposed parole. Walus will once again ask the court to either order his release or if it was not willing to do this, to refer the matter back to Minister of Justice & Correctional Services Ronald Lamola for reconsideration.

The Minister, in his opposing papers to this latest application, is still insisting that Walus must remain behind bars for the 1993 killing. He referred to the harsh words the court had when it sentenced him to death at the time, the Pretoria News report notes. It was later commuted to a life sentence when the death sentence was abolished. In his latest application, Walus said the Minister relied upon the sentencing remarks and the nature of the crime made by the judge 27 years ago. He said if reliance was made in all cases to sentencing remarks, many offenders would not be released on parole, which in terms of the law, they were entitled to. ‘The decision of the Minister is clearly discriminatory in nature without any justification and it constitutes unfair discrimination in accordance with provisions of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act,’ he said.

Full Pretoria News report

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.