Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Judge condemns SCA precedent in horrific rape appeal

Publish date: 19 August 2019
Issue Number: 837
Diary: IBA Legalbrief Africa
Category: South Africa

The lone woman on a three-person High Court Bench hearing a horrific gang rape appeal, has declared she is not obliged to follow a much-disputed 2011 decision by the SCA that would have greatly reduced the sentence. Such a declaration is unprecedented because lower courts are bound as a fundamental principle to follow the decisions of a higher court, writes Carmel Rickard for Legalbrief. Judge Khosi Hadebe's determination to maintain the life sentence imposed on one of a gang who raped a KZN woman comes in the middle of Women's Month when issues such as the struggle to protect women from rape and to punish rapists, are highlighted. Hadebe and two other (male) judges were considering the appeal by Xolani Ndlovu against his conviction and sentence for rape. Given life imprisonment by the Magistrate's Court, Ndlovu wanted the court to reduce his jail term. However, the High Court spotted that the magistrate had erred in his sentence: under the SCA's 2011 Mahlase decision, courts are not to impose life imprisonment as stipulated for gang rape, in cases where only one member of the gang was before court. Though the subject of ongoing criticism for creating anomalies and injustice, the Mahlase decision continues to be binding. The two men on the full Bench considering Ndlovu's appeal said in view of the Mahlase decision, the life sentence imposed on Ndlovu had to be set aside. They replaced it with a 15-year term. Hadebe, however, said in view of the horrific nature of the gang rape it would be 'outrageous' to impose a far lighter sentence and that the obligation to be bound by the SCA decision 'could be avoided'. Hadebe would have upheld the life sentence imposed on Ndlovu, but because she was in the minority, Ndlovu's sentence will now be reduced to 15 years.

Mahlase v S

Ndlovu v S

Full report on Legalbrief site

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.