Close This website uses modern features that are not supported by your browser. Click here for more information.
Please upgrade to a modern browser to view this website properly. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Opera Safari
your legal news hub
Sub Menu
Search

Search

Filter
Filter
Filter
A A A

Court cautions against abuse of Biowatch principle

Publish date: 02 December 2016
Issue Number: 4131
Diary: Legalbrief Today
Category: Constitutional

The Constitutional Court has cautioned against the abuse of the Biowatch principle, which it says does not mean risk-free constitutional litigation, notes Legalbrief. It made the comment yesterday when dismissing an application by Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) for leave to appeal a Gauteng High Court (Pretoria) judgment which struck from the roll with an adverse costs order an application brought after Home Affairs officials carried out large-scale search and arrest operations without warrants in private homes in Johannesburg. Scores of people were arrested. The Biowatch principle stems from a judgment (Biowatch Trust v Registrar, Genetic Resources) which provides that even when parties litigating against state parties lose a case, they are generally spared an adverse costs award, provided the case was of genuine constitutional import. The costs order in the LRH matter was confirmed by the Constitutional Court, which concluded that ‘a worthy cause cannot immunise a litigant from a judicially considered, discretionarily imposed adverse costs order’.

Lawyers for Human Rights v Minister in the Presidency and Others

We use cookies to give you a personalised experience that suits your online behaviour on our websites. Otherwise, you may click here to learn more, or learn how to block or disable cookies. Disabling cookies might cause you to experience difficulties on our website as some functionality relies on cookie information. You can change your mind at any time by visiting “Cookie Preferences”. Any personal data about you will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.